HD mounts without name and does not open effectively
Closed
Program123
Posts
2
Registration date
Tuesday June 7, 2016
Status
Member
Last seen
June 10, 2016
-
Jun 7, 2016 at 08:26 PM
R2D2_WD Posts 3606 Registration date Monday September 1, 2014 Status Member Last seen February 20, 2017 - Jun 14, 2016 at 03:15 AM
R2D2_WD Posts 3606 Registration date Monday September 1, 2014 Status Member Last seen February 20, 2017 - Jun 14, 2016 at 03:15 AM
Related:
- Hddsuperclone
- Stronghold crusader hd cheats - Guide
- Find and mount - Download - Backup and recovery
- Youtube downloader hd - Download - Video downloads
- Srs hd audio lab - Download - Other
- Flash player hd - Download - Other
1 response
R2D2_WD
Posts
3606
Registration date
Monday September 1, 2014
Status
Member
Last seen
February 20, 2017
155
Jun 9, 2016 at 04:46 AM
Jun 9, 2016 at 04:46 AM
Hi Program123 and welcome to CCM,
Could you try connecting the drive to the Windows PC again and opening Disk Management? Does the drive have a proper file format and the correct capacity? Using Linux was a great decision. It usually works when Windows cannot properly read information on the drive. I would recommend you to open the Windows Command Prompt and type the following command:
Chkdsk E: /r
Have in mind that E must be drive’s drive letter. If the scan does not recover the drive or cannot complete, I would recommend you to contact the seller and ask for further support.
Hope this helps
Could you try connecting the drive to the Windows PC again and opening Disk Management? Does the drive have a proper file format and the correct capacity? Using Linux was a great decision. It usually works when Windows cannot properly read information on the drive. I would recommend you to open the Windows Command Prompt and type the following command:
Chkdsk E: /r
Have in mind that E must be drive’s drive letter. If the scan does not recover the drive or cannot complete, I would recommend you to contact the seller and ask for further support.
Hope this helps
Jun 10, 2016 at 01:50 PM
One doubt, in your opinion, what it is best I do first?
If I try to backup by linux using HDDSuperclone or first I try to use chkdsk E: / r ?
1 - Is there a risk if I try to use chkdsk? And depending on the HD problem of reason, it gets worse, and I even lost the poor access that I can (in linux) now with HD?
2 - if I try to backup by the HDDSuperclone, without use the chkdsk is worse?
Because I heard that when the HD starts giving trouble is better not use much in it, at least decide what to do with HD.
I want to test both options, use the HDDSuperclone and chkdsk, but do not know whick of two is better do first.
What do you think?
Thanks in advanced
Jun 14, 2016 at 03:15 AM
I am sorry for answering you a bit late. It is always better to try backing up before using the hard drive or checking it for errors. You are absolutely right, using a drive with performance issues may damage it further. If you can, use a data recovery software or a backup tool in order to save the data and then use the command. Sometimes, depending on the problem, chkdsk may boost the performance, easing the backup process. Please, let me know if there is any progress.
Hope this helps