MS-DOS not seeing drive D
Closed
Bopper
Posts
11
Registration date
Wednesday August 3, 2016
Status
Member
Last seen
April 5, 2019
-
Aug 3, 2016 at 10:33 AM
Bopper Posts 11 Registration date Wednesday August 3, 2016 Status Member Last seen April 5, 2019 - Aug 7, 2016 at 03:57 AM
Bopper Posts 11 Registration date Wednesday August 3, 2016 Status Member Last seen April 5, 2019 - Aug 7, 2016 at 03:57 AM
Related:
- Google drive invalid ms-dos function
- Google meet download for pc - Download - Video calls
- Wd drive unlock - Guide
- Ocr in google drive - Guide
- Google drive photos - Guide
- Tiny11 iso google drive - Download - Windows
7 responses
Well, does BIOS find them both? IF you can boot into bios, look at the drives there. If the D drive is of another type SCSI or IDE, you may not have the drivers included to load on the disk. What type of drives are they?
Bopper
Posts
11
Registration date
Wednesday August 3, 2016
Status
Member
Last seen
April 5, 2019
Aug 3, 2016 at 06:56 PM
Aug 3, 2016 at 06:56 PM
Thought I had answered this, but don't see my reply, so I'll try again.
The BIOS does see both drives, both of which are IDE drives. C is a 40 GB Western Digital drive, and D is a 250 GB Western Digital drive.
When I am running under Windows XP, both drives work just fine.
The BIOS does see both drives, both of which are IDE drives. C is a 40 GB Western Digital drive, and D is a 250 GB Western Digital drive.
When I am running under Windows XP, both drives work just fine.
Bopper
Posts
11
Registration date
Wednesday August 3, 2016
Status
Member
Last seen
April 5, 2019
Aug 4, 2016 at 12:45 PM
Aug 4, 2016 at 12:45 PM
I am not aware that such a thing can happen without intervention. I know that it did not have D, E, or F...I tried them.
Didn't find the answer you are looking for?
Ask a question
You c0uld lways run fdisk, just dont tmaper with them. You could try:
wmic logicaldisk get name
That will verify the list.
I guarantee you are not loading IDE drivers when the DOS loads!
wmic logicaldisk get name
That will verify the list.
I guarantee you are not loading IDE drivers when the DOS loads!
Bopper
Posts
11
Registration date
Wednesday August 3, 2016
Status
Member
Last seen
April 5, 2019
Aug 5, 2016 at 10:24 AM
Aug 5, 2016 at 10:24 AM
I checked the C: directory and found two FDISK.EXE files, as shown
FDISK EXE 63,916 04-23-99 10:22p
FDISK EXE 63,916 02-23-13 9:19p
They were of course in different directories.
They were copied, one at a time, to A:, and run. In both cases, the result was the error message...
Incorrect MS-DOS version
According to Wikipedia, the FDISK utility has been replaced by DISKPART.
According to a search on C: there are three copies of DISKPART.EXE as shown:
Directory of C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32
08/04/2004 12:56 AM 163,840 diskpart.exe
Directory of C:\WINDOWS\$NtServicePackUninstall$
03/31/2003 12:00 PM 145,920 diskpart.exe
Directory of C:\WINDOWS\ServicePackFiles\i386
08/04/2004 12:56 AM 163,840 diskpart.exe
The two that are the same size have different creation dates.
Should I make any attempt to use DISKPART, and if so, which one?
Thanks for your help.
FDISK EXE 63,916 04-23-99 10:22p
FDISK EXE 63,916 02-23-13 9:19p
They were of course in different directories.
They were copied, one at a time, to A:, and run. In both cases, the result was the error message...
Incorrect MS-DOS version
According to Wikipedia, the FDISK utility has been replaced by DISKPART.
According to a search on C: there are three copies of DISKPART.EXE as shown:
Directory of C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32
08/04/2004 12:56 AM 163,840 diskpart.exe
Directory of C:\WINDOWS\$NtServicePackUninstall$
03/31/2003 12:00 PM 145,920 diskpart.exe
Directory of C:\WINDOWS\ServicePackFiles\i386
08/04/2004 12:56 AM 163,840 diskpart.exe
The two that are the same size have different creation dates.
Should I make any attempt to use DISKPART, and if so, which one?
Thanks for your help.
Bopper
Posts
11
Registration date
Wednesday August 3, 2016
Status
Member
Last seen
April 5, 2019
Aug 7, 2016 at 03:57 AM
Aug 7, 2016 at 03:57 AM
DiskPart was run and LIST DISK correctly noted the presence of C, D (both hard drives), E (a CD-ROM, and F (a hard drive connected through the USB port). C was noted as being an FAT32 drive, and D as NTFS, which is correct.
Both sizes were correctly stated, but the free space, in both cases, was incorrectly reported as 0.
I have wondered it the NTFS-type of drive D is the reason why MS-DOS will not see it. I can do a FAT32 format from DOS if need be.
Both sizes were correctly stated, but the free space, in both cases, was incorrectly reported as 0.
I have wondered it the NTFS-type of drive D is the reason why MS-DOS will not see it. I can do a FAT32 format from DOS if need be.